For example, sport organizations with more gender diverse boards were found to generate higher per-capita revenues (Wicker and Kerwin 2020) and report fewer financial problems (Wicker and Kerwin 2020). ![]() 2009) and sport organizations (e.g., Lee and Cunningham 2019). A number of studies have identified beneficial organizational outcomes of board gender diversity for both corporate (e.g., Terjesen et al. Importantly, achieving high levels of board gender diversity is not only relevant from an ethical perspective (Adriaanse 2016), but also from an economic perspective (Joecks et al. However, both politics and sport fail to report levels of gender diversity which are close to an equal representation of men and women (each 50%) (Adriaanse 2016 Inter-Parliamentary Union 2021). Specifically, both sectors have attempted to gender diversify their leadership personnel (Choi 2011 International Olympic Committee 2018a). Gender diversity in leadership positions is one element of good governance (Ferkins and Shilbury 2012), that has increased in importance in both politics and sport in recent years. Furthermore, sport governing bodies receive financial support from governments, while sport organizations can influence public opinions about current political topics like discrimination or gender diversity (Barnhill et al. Governments and sport governing bodies have several points of contact, such as the promotion of policy initiatives on inclusion or health, access to sport facilities, economic development, and successful performance at Olympic Games (Houlihan 2016). 2004), as some political goals can be achieved through sport (Harris and Dowling 2020). In several European countries (e.g., France, Denmark, Germany), national and state governments are closely interwoven with sport governing bodies (Petry et al. The findings indicate that women representation in sport governance is linked to state politics, suggesting that spillover effects occur from an organizations’ political environment. The share of women parliamentarians from the Social party and the share of women Conservative ministers are negatively related to women in sport governance. ![]() Regression analyses indicate that the share of parliamentarians from the Social Democrats and the Green party is positively associated with the share of women in sport governance, while the share of Liberals in the parliament is negatively related. The results show that on average 20.1% of board members in sport governing bodies are women. They were combined with state-level data on the government composition by gender and political party (parliament, ministers) based on the location of each sport governing body’s headquarter. Organizational-level data from German national and state sport governing bodies were collected ( n = 930). Specifically, it examines whether spillover effects occur from state parliament and government composition to board gender diversity within sport governing bodies. This study investigates the relationship between state politics and sport governance based on an institutional framework and the concept of spillover effects.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |